i and you for doing this you know i'm second exactly i don't here is

that answers and propose a novel in figure of science and technology and research find

ways that leaking just by

we introduce some recently some works the lower developing your own seems to incorporate the

that lisa

speaker and listened well speaking

so rather than a tutorial on capitol details we share our experiences indefinitely since between

the printer

one problem we face and one solution that we take

is enjoying work we understand processing of exercise does not hold on the high applied

to harness if indeed and submachine comma

and then problem topics to discuss i won't be able to cover everything details within

an hour of tutorial

so if you have some bar that you want more power domain imposed questioning decoding

in section

okay like to discuss what does this interpolator his

this is an example a final meeting people speaking different languages though there are two

main speaker and so interpreted as

it is done for one person speaking is five that once the japanese

mandarin speakers that is pretty intervals individual will translate probably induced feature by means

so the aim is to construct on the since it is interpreted it can be

proficient interpreter

one language translation is one of the knowledge of the and to mimic human integrated

income after from one language to another

this technology properties of the automatic speech recognition and upon this leads into the backs

in the source language

on the same translation the top on the text image source languages the corresponding text

target languages

and thanks to speech synthesis or pdas the generic space where problem based on the

x in the target language

however kind of finding a spoken with this is an extremely complex tasks

with the one this process is translation performance is the five have been the probability

like professional interpreter

so i don't the ls from sleep you the component and use

then we will discuss what we sell out is the worst different beam since the

greater

you know many people was on the baseline with analogies with five days are used

for

the development of automatic speech recognition has an apple as in the process and just

once the basic human speech

i don't walls for is a third approach is happy line are not with people

and technologies and then can be seen with dynamic time warping

and moved to the different approach with statistical modelling offers you don't model one male

portion which more or hmm gmm

this figure shows the generic structure of the original gmm furthermore

in commenting on what's of three main components impulse one is that was the one

with the theme in the acoustic probably don't have been genetically by itself bored or

phoneme based hmm

the second was his pronunciation lexicon with whatever the pronunciation of all with a sequence

of phones

and that one is like was more deal with a steaming the prior probability of

sequence of four

finally speech recognition decodings that we find the base station once all words according to

the speaker conversation a lexicon and language models

and the resurgence of dignity in the nist has also some place in the course

of really the on utilizing unlabeled transform it is are

maybe is that the performance e is a process things that's is very close to

the baseline formant for remote

for example a hybrid hmm and then estimates the posterior probabilities idea and

then there is also c d c or connectionist temporal classification

and also seconds to say what's more they with listen and stuff parental

the important part of thought differently there is simply by many complicated hence and in

more detail

and then why the weighted measure performance is to exactly

in the last twenty k it has been significant improvement in the has a performance

this can be thing and of jingle bayes theorem decrease in word error rate

in nineteen ninety three to work and or you can see what they that was

close to hundred percent

suddenly i am in microsoft this work have shown that speech recognition one is a

more you word error rate and professional transcription which was at all five point five

percent more generally

in a similar detection technology one has gradually sifted

no foundation for a system using we're all working and an analysis in this is

meant for

no weight for musical computational problems and no more flexible for using the thought that

income or the hidden semi-markov models gmm or svm and gmm

and something instead of the performance starts have been successfully constructed based on your programmable

so this time sequence of second from all

can i think that comes solely on import over complete d s

and provisional with men transform

the performance on t v is has also been improved be problem for is to

human likewise

in latest examples

most of restricted or and russian trick or treaters instruments

it's okay here is a little voice

no that isn't videos good has become more human-like as the following speech samples

it also listed on short notice two children and at a very close

in addition the google i would be viewed as we do not at all somebody

close to human speech

this system used a combination of cognitive gives a changing is in the discrete is

and using the hold on with meant to control intonation depending on the second

in a system become his or in trying to scale to have found an appointment

or whole utterance to estimate the separation

i will resemble the second one

menu

i

for every

where i

well p o

so it's of great here we cannot be president anymore with one if you want

in which one with murphy you get similar papers on their website

okay so we have seen that both examine the fa improve the quality close to

your buddy

okay we solve all problems

that is that the balloon model was used to train a

and how we can utilize the time maybe a system

is it is an example as before we just by their own meeting between two

people speaking different languages

that's a more powerful is an iterative process of interpretation

where one of the speech in one languages

they will use a and we don't we can be enough to sentencing was translated

and speak to the other speaker in another language

this means that the estimation process before is simply the end of the sentence

and i don't paper has the ability to do some other in this process we

just listening don't leading and speak

so the channel started from unseen speakers integrator are not uncommon by a size and

the idea is to construct a machine that have the ability to listen one is

speaking as well as their ability to perform recognition and synthesis fits into by

that was discussed ill posed problem one with the following unless you can listen while

speaking

and is an incentive produce the basic mechanics so in this congregation which is called

the speech at

and mechanism have a slight disturbance mesa therefore for the speaker's mind to the listeners

my

it consists of speech production we can see something with the speakers is worth and

you know based soundwave

and a week the speech waveform to me

the data as this perception process happen in the listeners identity system can perceive what

was said

can close to speech in exactly so has a critical out to be but we

can assume for speaker small to the u

that would be able to communicate few hundred to how to use and state

you know how to talk like one company but their articulation and listening to solve

problems

so again here we leave behind with acquisition possible speech and speaker system hasn't could

be allowed to keep k

so the children who was there really of them have difficulty to produce three states

even adults can be count after becoming proficient with the languages nonetheless for speech articulation

be applied as a result of the that all the three

human brain that is inside a model integration in speech processing

so the auditory system is critically important steps and all speakers and the model system

is critically both in the progress and all states

so that was done by three or four on the next we have seen it

sounds like model response talking face okay feeding both doing the busted perception mostly is

and to encode for all samples articulation

so this means that the process false this perception and production is not unique ability

on the other hand competitors also are able to learn how to use and how

to speak

as we know by whales mixture and within the how to use the so given

the state is people point out that

and also by werewolves text as seen this is if you know how does b

but computers cannot hear their own voice

and then release lsp a separately and then

and therefore requires a little more robust and next thing in sort of points way

more attention

but the question is can we do a long lasting that can listen while speaking

now discuss how to develop a sequence in speech and framework

the proposed approach to the logo slow speech in one based on clean

this is particularly model it indicates human speech perception and production here

it is to have a system that not only can be silence p but also

is somewhere speaking

this is a standard is not in tts framework in which the training to independently

as we mentioned before by where is the most you can learn how to lisa

and by where yes in the second the how to speak

now here estimates in speech and free will

so we can look connection from asr to tts and vts database or

this means yes really see the asr output and may so really see if the

output probability s

or in other words a sunken this that the what did you say

the key idea here is to train both baseline vts models jointly

in the training they the frame level training with a label in a globally in

some reasonable baseline mean

where a sliding scale encourages fighter using unlabeled data engineering useful for you rate

including bounced against imposing we use a starting today is modeled independently using standard way

in more detail

if the original speech

one white

is the original text

huh is the predicted streams

well why

if the predictive text

so the a set of is that are from x the whitehead

you know using all sequences are more militant on what is the text

and the there is a into a problem to white to x had so hugh

we also used to you know second one model control for text to squeeze

i don't case it is interesting speech and the only difference cases where the but

also in text they are available

so given a pair of skis and that's the a one model can be trained

independently in support by selecting

is this can be done by minimizing the loss between the predicted that the sequence

and the ground to sequence

so for its this is by minimizing the loss between y and y head

and for the tts this is done by minimizing the x and x and

is there is when one is fifty five central

for this thing will be for unsupervised domain

given on this feature x

it is pretty the most possible transcription y huh

and based on why cooking is trying to reconstruct this feature

and let the loss yes between the original space feature x

and predicted streams extract

so therefore or this is possible to improve tediously speech-only by it is portable phase

are

now see that all cases where only text data is available

so given only text features y

it is generally it's this feature x have

and based on x head as a try to record a text regions y

and we got but also it is out of between original text feature y and

of but that's what y k

so here it is possible to improve a start with excellently by support of tts

so the overall any object is to minimize baseline and it is lost doing was

proposed by let me really write something well and possible by let me when only

unclear probable

so the basic idea is to able to train domain that's without or getting the

old one

if we set off i'll be greatly zero one this means that we can use

a portion of the loss and the canadian provided by the training set

but if we set off i was zero this means that we completely learning curve

with only speeds or latex

but this is the overall structure of a star we use the segments of segments

from which is similar to a lot so that misspell proposed by janet all to

draw some fifty

so it has in order according to an attention model

they one is x which is this is features

and a good is why which is the act sequence

and i is the importance they were it's t is the decoder state and the

attention models produce context information

at time do you which is a line between the encoder and decoder hidden state

and the loss function is colour we be between the white and a pretty good

why where c here is the number of output classes

similar to a silence detector this is that can subsequently be as baseline control for

it is also classes in court are they going to an ancient old one

x r is a linear spectrogram feature what i x and stands to talk about

features and wise that x include

and is the oldest and hence the decoded as they can attention borders context information

based on a hundred and recorded hidden state

note that kind of lost the first one is database your space to function lost

and the second one is the and a sentence detection with cross entropy

okay so let's discuss some experiments we since the chain

in this week's features we use a d-dimensional mel spectrogram

one thousand four dimensional in the spectrogram

yes it second thoughts between problem by using a finland can pretty the phase and

false stft

and for the next we used in the six off of it six complexion more

actually special cost

by our proposed mental we experiment on a corpus with a single speaker

because i'm is only most agencies by the economy are trained on a single speaker

dataset

we less another mostly single speaker data to just mean and use talked also about

what training of all on a more than one and four hundred one for this

or

most similar several situation

for this when for training data with parameters with the that's the or probable

and the second one is when one small portion of it have to wear speakers

and text data and non-target cannot utilize text or space data on

and the last one is when wanting to devise bands present text data

then we showed that is okay so you know use the error rate for a

while waiting a somewhat in

this is the result when the system was trained we will training data

we can see are three point one percent

no one and channel has a transcript and things the l and the remaining one

we have speech or basically only with an example this year become so you one

point seven percent which is quite high

and but it is only one speaking we assume states mechanism

it and you yes can be designed their using a very low and generally useful

feedback

results show that we improve its performance from something one point seven percent and twelve

point three percent

we separately and twenty five percent is only and twenty four percent and only is

okay three point five percent eer

it was very close to the system used for a hundred percent they're data

nineteen and actual pdf they sell

what it is experiment we report the emergency we pretty well male and a lot

welcome to the ground to the ground truth

results show that a starving tedious model have been trained with small gradient ascent

this is are there

using a really engine used would be great

the all along with formal training be has no square zero point six

and with only ten percent brand it on the last become one point in

zero five

then by listening was speaking one we explore only with phase we also included it

is performance

the summary inspired by the human speech in we propose a gaussian speech and often

able to most into conformity somewhere speaking and achieve something strong bias let me

and mechanism a novel and found it is still it is it harder when there

is if i'm really to analyze identity is too important leasing pair and optimized on

whatever we could is construction cost

however the one sentence the sort of the system was able to handle unseen speaker

this is done also only we mix the voice a given speaker via the speaker

identity by one hundred and twenty

furthermore has are also on the other two speaker specific central speaker because to is

unable to produce a more or is this problem in speaker

so there are we tried to improvement and then a lot of this incredible seems

to change

so the eighties to handle voice characteristics are unknown speaker

you know in the area of speaker recognition system into the speech in little

and i spent a globally deal yes to have the same speaker using one speaker

adaptation

after the couple with a star and we develop a speech in primal better and

what do you a speech problem unknown speaker

this morning mankind is somewhere only it is available

and it really most possible package and y

we can recognition profile speaker everybody's they're finally based on y and z two d

s try to construct an x have

indeed yes loss is calculated between original speech feature x and x huh

one the other hand went on the actually is available

you samples speaker factors the

yes each and every speech feature x have based on that x y and speaker

close to

then given x head and is a try to recall a white

it's a loss is calculated between original x y and of predicting one

is a consequence is a is the same as in basic the since speech at

when the second to stick when it is no additional input on the speaker factor

so now they're kind of loss function

one is this recall such a loss we can see

the second one is and of sentence production rules with cross entropy

and you one is the percent one loss which is the cosine distance between the

original and unique speaker and basically

we're on our experiment on the task is multi-speaker data which is the worst original

dataset

we normalize the speech a necessary supplies not mean that for will be there is

i before any assigned to hunter its parent where training set

and i four records is around seven thousand across of all sixteen hours of speech

spoken by native speakers

well as on the consists of all something else and it is about sixty six

our spoken by two hundred speakers

so if you know we use a month or they have ninety three

and then f are likely to for dataset

sure that is already some

we first train baseline model by using examples for is i t for state only

and we choose seventeen point seventy five percent eer

in the second rule we train a little we clearly tell the full was originally

aside two hundred eighty four data and its you seven point what we can see

are

it is our global performance

and in the last four we trained on one deal with some reasonable price than

using as i before s period and as i two hundred and we're at all

for comparison

we are more training with something simplifies the mean

we get a label propagation mental

where we train the original one really there's this text is i before

we realised are pretty good initial one we don't really using data

so for text only right side two hundred we're stationed ideas to generate the corresponding

speakers

and for speech-only is idle under we'll stage channel is not to do that the

corresponding thanks

often there and we train a more the other with a generic full training set

our results shown by using label propagation is absolutely use the cr fourteen point fifty

a gaussian

nevertheless

speech and model could achieve a significant improvement

and it's we nine point eighty six percent c are

which close the door one result

similarly answer yes loss could also be viewed as the training to him as in

switching

no you want to show some speech samples

the first one is the baseline model where we train only with something percent greater

detail

this is a rate of travel and actually provide a solution

then might be lies inside hundred percent are very well with speech change

this is because the server the problem actually provide a solution

and the one model trained with appropriate training set

a basis to read the travel

they actually provide a solution

no one will but it also the speaker d as they still

is this the baseline

the bases aren't the problem they actually provide a solution

and this is basically changed

the basis of the problems i actually provide a solution

and is just a horrible model

the places aren't the problem actually provide a solution

and can see that in one with a very

it is gonna be improved significantly

so that a summary we proved most of speech and still had voice correctly speech

from unknown speaker

in which the s can generate speech with similar voice kind of these big on

we one shows speaker example

and it's not also okay you need are from the combination between the accent and

an arbitrary voice characteristics

however there is another limitation in the current frame

if we only have actually been performed or prompted us to a soft and all

and only is with the big but lost

one the other hand if we only have this data we perform based on the

ideas and only duty as it came across

this is because the publication error for the reconstruction lost to a star is challenging

note that the output of base obviously don't

the house always so improbable

we will discuss our solution to handle back propagation good basically no

the figure shows the speech or with speaker anybody mortars

in the original from all the roles of ideas couldn't we probably conformable why because

of this is in

no postal address the problem is nist meeting gradient of whatever why we try to

estimate the

to understand why the gradient of this operation is not be by considered as a

function

is it can see almost everywhere a small changes in that you would result doesn't

and employed in the all pole

and so on the lda zero

for change very good is not zero the gradient is in pretty

and so it is not used for formant recognition

i don't want lead to good on this problem will be to use a continuous

approximation dataset fashion

but they fail to produce discrete all

so the solution was trained on the two i see our papers which is used

almost all x distribution

it requires a simple mental for all sample from a technical institution we class probabilities

let me talk in more detail

the main problem we use this notion that the calibration is not giving stable

so that all this issue is to use some loss function as an approximation to

one loss function

and three or four efficient way of sampling from the can take the oldest equation

by saving a random variable g to do all the probabilities

and then parameter that controls how closely they used and was approximately screen one vector

instead i equal to zero the softmax computation smoothly to mister are lost and a

simple spectral amplitude of one

on the other hand if the t is equal good vad sample pack become you

pull

the loss is currently in the good over here we place degradation prediction of different

sample y over b y with id two d

in this experiment we use multi-speaker or thing to allow the ascent okay

there is something a bit

with the use of a convolutional next we all been eleven percent relative improvement compared

to our previous frame

"'cause" to somebody we aim was in speech and mechanism by allowing back propagation through

the screen or because they soliciting later

in the future it is necessary to the probability effectiveness of the protocol for is

lined with

no an additional mechanism when we extend of speech into the model chain

we know the in human communication the most common we for human of the comic

at high speeds

but alignment system cannot know what is completely without a connection to the whole by

us to section

so human communication is actually multi sensory and in boston communication channels

not only of three but also fits or channels

humans perceive this multiple source of information together to build the general concept

basically the idea of incorporating visual information for speech processing is not new

we know there is i'm the of is always are

but more samples are usually done by simply concatenating the formation

individually was information can

and this mental usually require all information from different model it is something altogether

but on the other hand but i'll be is often available

we have run the weakness in speech instead of the last three from the mean

of five parallel space and text data

it probably wasn't ability to include a something tedious performance in semi-supervised learning

by following examined it is that it is are given only the accent only speech

data

unfortunately although it removes the requirement of five being for normal apparently a in the

only required to have a lot size of vehicle

so you study is limited only with speech and text for modeling p

so a single before then the fact no obligation is actually working modeled in for

no on the other day system but also results in something

you know proposed multimodal seems jane to meet all around human communication and non-weighted result

modeling

specifically we design a gender detector the clinic speech recognition or a cyber space in

this is or pdas immense cepstral mean or i c emitted by our or image

generation i g

it can be trained using these four points variation by assisting each other given incomplete

data and averaging postal data preparation within the chain

so there is a question now case can we still improve asr even austin's or

text data available

similar to this change them for this case is where we have well i don't

know ready to all speech image and then x

we can separately any start e d s i si and alright g using supervised

learning

next one is that simplifies the mean

in my office emails and text data

the left side is when the input is emails all speech-only data

i is are and i see we generally x this on speed or image in

one

and this is an immense will be reconstruction and allows can be used to back

propagated t v is alright g

come on the right side is when include is text only d o

one and they say that it is and i'm to regenerate sneezing units respectively

and sre i seem to the costs on the text

i this way a star and i c can be propagated to its construction cost

and improve the performance

is the case where only a single node leds available

for example

when we speak only d o

transcribed by asr

and if the hybrid bases are then used to generate an email by nist

and we constantly emails we i see we get another x hypothesis

we did not the laws and improve the unseen more detail

on the other hand when we happen humans only they are i will generate tax

transcription then the caption and synthesise industries by is more detail

and then the synthesized is are then transcribe what is more detail

we then also there is a description against the intermediate extraction

so this is our main interest to see if the image on the data can

help to improve day so

so we can also create another automatically with a single multimodal chain

with we call m c two

because maybe if we want to investigate the possibility of applying the chain mechanism in

a simple remote is of would be more tomorrow

in what you mean and with a process all together with what they are available

we immensely to detect small you know

so what is in ways or speech-only

in speech to text will obviously a emails into x

yes and i d we consider this present in

and the reconstruction was can be used to improve the ideas or i g

and when the in one is that only we can cover the cost function was

for text hypothesis is of immense this the best one two

my back propagated is lost image speech-to-text model can be too

but i that aims at and bt is similar with the one we can the

since pitching

now discuss that's detector of image captioning and image generation

what i see we use an efficient human captioning one real problems show it and

then they'll

and for i t views attention can we just someone this image generation using open

city are lost

well in to the extremes the same source multimodal whatever we to in order

so this in order of seem you know we that is not encoder and the

ica overdone

in the morning on mine the output layer probability for a starting i see in

order to introduce some information sharing

in a single information

well in it was bizarre available really going to use only the corresponding within a

year

one experiment we will probably eight k dataset

eight emails we're in private connection

as for all you use the corresponding sixty five hours not grasp is multi-speaker data

it one by how one and lost

we simulate recognition we're all pretty bad that's not the axes

our okay used to see how robust mental performed in a single one really data

c

so we make the operation you mean subset has different modality

yes portion has pairs mistakes and units

this kind of one also has all model e d but it is a pair

and the one point one on have speech or spontaneity

is the result of our experiment

well the and m c one added it will be small sample currently our baseline

monolingual seventy six point seventy five c are

and with the speech a using a dataset

this eer was reduced to fifteen point

and boston

then by using speech on the humans on t is the are still be with

the reduced to well what is the most expensive

so it is only really a sample be proved even with all speed and takes

the now

we can also see improvement on the other more for example the idea model could

be improved given one of these bits data

a similar and its e

also happened for the m c to a single chain

it is an assistant also successfully we use the z are probably twenty six point

sixty seven

two point seventy two percent

some very nice speech in a lot to train in some be supported by slamming

without a real data

you know we calculate a switching mechanism in the whole be more touching by jointly

training the ica i'd in more detail in a collection

and the resulting feel that the loss to still improve asr in all the image

data is available

okay now all challenge in what's happening unless in space integrator

we discuss therefore we must seen that can listen was speaking

now discuss the second channels

so if you know roles to problem to is how to different agreement on a

side ideas for real-time seamlessly incorporated

we have the same beep or the justice translation table one sets of a sound

and d and d is

in this manner the process of the oscillation is that the sentence by sentence

so forth nice the whole space a difference in the source line with

then we currently in this work into the other languages

and finally synthesized oppose and in the target language industries

used to you meetings the literature to hang on the complete sentence can be long

and complicated p

so most integrator past me maybe coefficient of predatory that's a the incoming speech stream

from the source language to the target languages in real time

for the process so we can come like this

so one point channels for sleeping is the development of incremental asr

and you know we discuss our solution in developing neural increment a star

this can lead to its cost something incremental a size that the one will need

to decide the incremental step and the transcription

the aligned with the conference on speech segment

it's we know the engine make i mean something sequences like when it is not

use of globalisation probability quite the computation of a weighted sum initiation of things i

in plastic we have generally biting or if they

this means the system can only generate x output of these can be entirely input

sequence

consequently utilizing you in situation that require immediate recognition is typical

for storing limit the sri asr have been proposed

one approach is to use a lot of attention

and that and one proposed by wine so

a boy a unique directional antenna with a c t c acoustic model

gently and also what was not only people using broad classes the remote

that incrementally recognize the input speech waveform

however most existing euro isr models utilize from frameworks and learning algorithms

and i'm not completely against you know it is are

here our solution is to employ the original i-th detector

attention with a star which of the sequence

and then we perform i mentioned a where well as a star is to determine

what and highest are yes the students more two

so the isr can be makes the statistics alignment problems based on asr

this is the overall speaker

one is the teacher model which is the non-incremental asr

while the right one is the students more detail which is the incremental asr

and this one is the ancient past four

from the teacher more detail

to the students model

in recognitions their eyes are exactly the same man and four is that i a

summary for the tension alignment wrong non-incrementally sound model

in the last of aligned to the people

to go in and we'll the local and all blocks even more

do not show that performance was it on a dataset

this is the performance of stand out a start by x is the publication

and this is our standard case are

what these results on the result of our claim entirely summer

as you can see that is something field results as well you use the delay

while maintaining comparable performance was final is are

there we d n

summary we give a note that in some other and or you know i-th detector

of neural a star

you know we performed for me

where with three standard a star recipe to model and i is are assisted in

more detail

experimental result you feel the results to really the only

and still active comparable performance this time not a start date with an idea

now discuss how to develop purely limited all previous

so similar to i guess problem

the channels in fact an incremental db is that the model to produce based upon

receiving a call target samples from the and system

as the two handles shortly is then sent bands

we find out dataset by randomly split into four sequence

in short pause and at the beginning and symbols to input your text

here we use different people to differences the human location within the full set comes

so s is the standard speaking and one of "'em"

in the middle center speaking and

recall that we still based on style no

the whole problem and doing this

you know we made from the training in a sentence by sentence of first one

frustration without much modification to the original one

this experiment we used japanese single speaker dataset or to use a data set that

includes about seven thousand and or an hour or the u

spoken by using only the female speaker

the input text consists of forty five one single and then the accent types

a big show the naturalness of the raw score and it's in the size you

in japanese new ideas

we do not use where for that so there has been widely okay between generated

speech and not all speakers

nevertheless here we can see that the size of fa in most quality due to

different unique things

results in it might is one separates or what were

it's almost two point all the more score

and the synthesized speech quality improve for one you in two connecting to or three

units

so that plays an example

the first one is where and the increment also is everyone x and place

you do not match you know that the model that

and this is for to a same faces

you don't have to do not another important

and this is for three i think phrases

you do not much time of day the model

is for the whole sentence you do not to do not imagine

and this is for sentence you do not too much time of day you know

that

this is the clusters any not putting them in and

so the results i just use japanese you know i yes when command files in

the size you need a between the us in parentheses

two whole sentence you

but to somebody we are therefore not rely is based on segments are sent one

variable

next element is something feel that linguistically general one phrase is critical and the next

linguistic features are nice e

and a minimum increment a single site was between the real thing phrases and house

and vicinity

now we discuss how we combine all samples and then for the incremental sre and

d is the one of the neighboring real-time the since the interpreter

we have reported in the since speech in a son is we're going to be

to the connection and the number of gaussians the listened one speaking

there are two process is not lead us

and from p d is to use so

what worked out in the last sentence level

because of that it requires a long really well especially when encountering input sequence

in contrast

humans can be so the one they speak in real time

and if there is that the only the hearing

they won't be able to contain speech

so this means that this is you for the to perform over time

a feedback mechanism

here we propose to also incremental dustin change in which we contact i assign and

i'm yes we saw be back to

so the aim is to use a group delay and improve my i d as

listening quality by in terms for each other within a short sequence

the loading mechanism incrementality in staging is similar to the one in basic missing speech

jane

a different smell

we used as shown to be made between the components

feedback loop can also be into two processes

i have a new ideas and provide us to a is are

in i so that i guess process

well it's incremental step

in minnesota tech mean

i generally corresponding ensure that

and i the ethical practise on speech utterance based on the ice a text out

and the law here is currently by comparing the original space and i guess be

due to the i d s

we is process and increase the end of the speech

this process is from i yes to outliers are

so similar recipe for example we have of context here in the front

we begin by taking the point of the accent right and i'm guessing the size

of sauce is based on this day

i is a pretty the source based on section

and the loss here is calculated for i saw by comparing the i is a

text output and that one too complex

we repeat the same person to tell us exactly

again in this experiment we investigated the performance using will lead to validate countries

is the result of standard asr and b d is

well these are the case of ice and i d is

we also from the horizontal axis

where is a very small where n is a rhino r and d s r

i d is working independently

and this all the result window with three using speech imploring and false preaching

well i is a we can only z are given that was input and the

big space from i d is

similarly for i e d s we can we lost given that for text actually

by the eyes are

this was done to investigate if you pay scorsese because the quality feedback will affect

the fusion performance

as you can see we decrease eer baseline really good for seventy percent

fourteen percent with the seventies despised chain

and i'm both and we simplify speech in

the improvement also used for recognition results in the input

so he really use the are from point before twelve percent

so yes i is performance also you grew where it was trained using incremental speech

e

so that one there is something if we don't the ones for more coldly is

the delay and including point four miles of segmental system

okay so now we reduce the overall solution and feature selection

so here we have demonstrated we can also be seen speech in the table two

is a speaker identities and was speaking

in commonly we mostly utility to achieve some is priceless mean

on the other hand we have also i have some ideas

and then we combine ideas are and i p is really incrementality in speech and

variable

in the future we will therefore audio time we hold since in the way that

lisa translates the and use that was speaking and template

so this is the situation that we use in this so i

these are our publication data could be still do

yes including nebula since the same framework

well in one since the chain

multimodal the since machine leaming balinese r and d is an incremental the scene screeching

but this is the and all that the eer in some way ration it let

me know by imposing question in the korean in section and you