alexander myers i'm an economics major and i'm from san diego cal

the title of my honours thesis is exploring the stability of race preferences over different

scale

the thesis statement is a if an individual experiences more temptation in one period over

another specifically the present over the future

then they will behave in a more risk averse manner and present them to sort

explain what that means that sorta have that step back a second and i realise

that individuals are generally assumed to avoid the risk

and the reason for that is that we experience what's called the diminishing marginal utility

of

and the concept is if you're very wealthy one dollar doesn't really give you that

let utility but if you very poor it gives you a lot

and so one of the one of the things is that even if people or

risk averse if they're dealing with really small gambles like a coin flip for a

dollar for tensor tail

i

gambles that compared to their lifetime well for a really small

then even though they are risk averse in general for that gamble they will behave

as not risking

and what recently to really means is that so long as there is a and

expected value that's positive for the gamble they will take a or if they're evaluating

two different gambles they will refer the one that if they average out the expected

winnings would be slightly that's the one that they are

if there did in a fifty percent chance of winning a million dollars or losing

five hundred thousand dollars even though that has the expectation that they will win some

money

the loss of five and a thousand dollars or so catastrophic that they wouldn't take

it wouldn't take that because you're risk averse and so the issue is that

in laboratory experiments we would expect that people even if their risk averse for large

k would be risk neutral for the small

and so i came up with the theory that explain some anomalous laboratory results of

risk aversion over small sticks

and the weight explained it is by saying that

even though

mainstream economic theory assumes that if for example you received an unexpected winning eighty dollars

in a period

the main economic theory assumes that you would spread that out over your life

you would read integrated into your

you you're optimal consumption stress and so

temptation is sort of a concept that means that you don't you instead of spreading

it over a lifetime of periods you might spend it all five period six periods

or maybe one pure you might just go out to the store by can you

is your company that's the that the concept that i'm that i'm sort of tapping

into

and so my hypothesis is basically that when people have more

a more temptation when

they're hungrier and more likely to go

you know after the experiment in go get a candy bar

that they will behave in a more descriptors that and one way to think about

why that would be is that let's say you're sitting in the experiment and you're

starving and you have the expectation that you know you're given the choice a fifty

percent chance of getting thirty dollars in the fifty percent chance of getting forty dollars

or a fifty percent chance of getting seventy dollars

and fifty percent chance of getting you know

now

in terms of

the expected value of those two lotteries the same on average you're gonna get thirty

five dollars but the point is that if you get zero you can't go get

a signal and that's unfortunate for a hungry person participating in the experiment so

i guess that's sort of

one way of understanding what

annotation means and how

most economists are interested in modeling real world situations with lots of people or businesses

or

situations where

were it is reasonable to expect people to be rational

there are

the there are other economists on that

are part of the field known as behavioural economics that look at what the people

actually do at least in laboratory experiments and how does that relates you what we

think they should

and so that sort of that the vein that my that my thesis is it

it's a an experimental thesis conducted on amherst college students

basically it gave them options for boundaries to participate in with different probabilities and payoffs

in the last and to choose which one which one do you want

and with the cab the art that there's a chance that will actually get the

money that you

are choosing and so

the goal of that obviously was to keep them on its what to their really

what and so

and that sorta where the

why the temptation appears because

when you deal with real behaviour real situations you have to account for why didn't

they do the prediction well why didn't they behave hyper ration

so temptation is one attempt to

do there's one professor out what one of by readers a c and that within

the other day and the meeting to the total number of being very critical of

my work

and so i it was sort of sort of an advanced meeting

and so he said

what i just why you don't know i'm taking the position that a referee for

journal with because we're talking about

potentially publishing and i said no you know that makes a lot a lot of

science

you know thank you for giving me the core questions that i would have to

explain

if someone more were evaluated my work and

another propose a common that that's what the pieces differences that's what the questions are

through doing my thesis i

became really interested in doing research which

it's not that i didn't like to before she's i'd never had the opportunity to

actually do my own research and so i'm sort of feeling that i'm leaning towards

graduate school at some point

in the future in terms of short-term colours i'm definitely gonna continue working on my

thesis

do some more data analysis rewrite it and then see if i can get it

published integer

i think that a lot of

things that were significant about my amherst college experience

manifested themselves in my thesis

so what specifically

i wrote a behavioural economics this is the and that's not really normal or standard

for on economics

and that sort of has to do with

me you know through college figuring out what it is that i that i want

what it is that i that i like that i'm interested in and so you

know instead of writing i it would be the importance of what i was a

self more

i wanted to go into investment bank

because i thought that's what

that's what you do that's what you're supposed to do

i have found this field

i ran with it i roll my thesis on it and in many ways you

know that

these soft more version of me wouldn't have done

i

on another level i think my thesis will be really significant inasmuch as

i have a really strong feeling that

the process of writing my thesis disorder nudged me on a different track for where

i go from here so i that you know in that sense it's almost the

most important part of my of my college experience in as much as i think

after honing in on what really interest me and what excites me intellectually the thesis

really dave maybe answer