the video abstract is on the cost effectiveness analysis orbital a direct the mean and
balloon angioplasty press this balloon angioplasty alone
in today's healthcare system environment cost considerations are becoming more critical
when choosing optimal and the vascular therapy to treat peripheral artery disease
it cost benefit analysis such as this can help answer the question does using another
device such as horrible after a to me
during balloon angioplasty
provide long-term cost and outcomes benefits compared to angioplasty alone
in our analysis we use the diamond
back coronary orbital a directed me system
the diamond back is unique in that it is a blatant list system which consists
of a crown used to stand away classified lesions well the more elastic tissue flexes
away
overlap directly procedures remove classify vision material
to increase that's the compliance
which may lead to reduced q vascular injury
but i mean back system allows the blood and micro to brie of low-pass the
crown and hindi only dispersing particular
cooing the crown and reducing the risk of thermal injury to the target vessel
so in constructing our analysis we used data from the complaint three sixty study of
the diamond backs system
outcomes data and cost data through twelve months were used
hospitals provided cost data in the form of uniform billing reports or you be of
force
quality of quality adjusted life yours or qualities
for each state of the patient populations we're gathered from previously published literature
it should be noted
that procedure success for both away s plus to be a and b a was
defined as no pair procedural standing
so the results of our treatment outcomes
demonstrate that the majority of o a s plus be a population resulting in procedure
success
conversely the majority of be a population resulted in procedure failure
meaning
pair procedural stands were placed
all four on the study were followed through twelve months
resulting in three primary outcomes
p c wrist analysis or provocation
a little worse literature search resulted in health utility values
as follows
procedure success was given assigned the highest held utility value
followed by procedure failure
with trista noses resulting in the lowest help utility value
berlin these inputs were
constructed into an incremental cost effectiveness ratio analysis
the be a the average cost for the be a population was slightly lower than
the average cost for the yes plus be a population
however
the qualities for the away s plus be a population were higher than the be
a population
this resulted in a incremental cost effectiveness ratio
of three thousand four hundred and forty one dollars
which is sit well below the standard threshold of fifty thousand dollars
that is used in determining
whether to implement and you technology
so in conclusion
this study provide compelling cost effectiveness data to demonstrate comparable results for all e s
plus b a
versus be a low
more importantly
the data demonstrates that the placement of you were sentence
allows for more tree and options should we intervention occur
the increase in treatment options equals
reduce cost in the long term
this provides
compelling data for intervention a list
to treat classified from a poplar till regions
which of long band as standing challenge