look transfusion is the technology
which was made possible
when core long steiner discovered log
and like much more than but this in
most of blood transfusions discovery
have been developed through war
so the during the first world war
the discovery of how but could be stored
and transfusions later
was very important in establishing
the block bank industry
as a result of these developments many thousands of lives
have been saved when transfusions have been given in situations where the cool necessity
and this technology has through
we have seen the development
also called global component therapy
whereby one donation
can how many patients in different diseases
these have been huge advancements
and have made possible
the saving of many lives
however propose a steeper bacchus and i
how we pondering greatly about the current state as and the future of blood transfusion
and we have noticed many methods which give us
as experience transcriptionists for many years
course for consider
we have pondered all the way in which a transfusion
in many countries in the western world has become strongly attached problematical of what i
meant
so that much of the activity of curves'
in a large centralised not collection and processing centres
and one of the connection is made with the actual clinical areas
which need to utilise the but
this has spent in our view
to the development of a paradigm
the paradigm as defined by thomas kuhn the great american philosopher of science is the
way in which a certain nexus of arrangements become entrenched and viewed as common sense
and whereas they are basically the reflection of the way things are c
i'm not necessarily the weighting should be
and this aspect we see but not transfusion becoming part of a paradigm which is
based upon manufacture rather than up on madison
much of this has good as the result of justifiable concerns about the safety of
that primarily through the very sad events
involving aids and hepatitis wireless transmission and the nineteen eighties
however the pendulum has now swung to a and the result of the manufacturing paradigm
has one the detachment tremendous
we have therefore proposing
that then you hear well think field of function of management should pose as the
you paradigm for blood transfusion
and that rather than focusing attention on the back and the boundary we should focus
attention on the names of the patient
we should specify but not components in terms of what is clinically need and not
in terms of pharmaceutical principles which may or may not be relevant for the transfusion
no longer
in other words we want blood transfusion to start focusing again on the needs of
the sick and in this way to assume it's rightful place as an essential technology
and support for model madison