how we're so show which was funded by
not an issue health research and the medical research council in the united kingdom
how the objective of estimating the
a cost effectiveness ratio that should be used white noise
that is
the amount of money
the n h s
should spend all two
how units of health improvement offered by new medical intervention
so in terms of the that the readership of our report i think there are
number of important stakeholders firstly pats primarily the national institute
the health clinical excellence
the second relevance like a would be the department of health in the u k
and the thoughts like a group
i think would be the n h s more generally
in the decisions a resource allocation decisions are taken over time in the images not
just by a white noise in the department help of i
principal way every
adopt and thus
administrator in the system
and those results allocations decision the decisions should also be considering she's the cost effectiveness
i
it may be that our estimate of the threshold
is informative in their decisions about how much they should be kind of have good
as well
so i think they that they you obviously key conclusion about work is that we
have an estimate from threshold which is estimated we consider one so that e
but is there to be considered more relevant policy like this
the workshop would
how limited out how
data
routinely collected i'd really and edges all to estimate the cost affect the threshold l
work tells us something we haven't not very much about before
and that is that's high the pensions
whose health
is full column
as a result of the n h s deciding to
found more expensive medical intervention