0:00:26 | okay my means time to go through interaction |
---|
0:00:31 | here today sanders risk connected you recent paper and symbolic interaction focused on relationship with |
---|
0:00:40 | how |
---|
0:00:41 | thank you very much here with us and talk state |
---|
0:00:45 | should be top |
---|
0:00:46 | together with you about what are the sixties how is present or |
---|
0:00:52 | as well as your experiences |
---|
0:00:56 | but is six use what was like the heyday of sociology so my cohort when |
---|
0:01:03 | i came into northwestern and sixty six |
---|
0:01:07 | head over sixty people |
---|
0:01:10 | and how we how we come to what was to your before |
---|
0:01:14 | so at a party bernie back says talk to predict back about what i'm interested |
---|
0:01:18 | says you need to meet how it back or |
---|
0:01:23 | and i at that time i didn't actually know how you back or was that |
---|
0:01:27 | northwestern head |
---|
0:01:30 | i read outsider's because i was kind of interest rate one |
---|
0:01:34 | and |
---|
0:01:36 | but i didn't where is the results of great |
---|
0:01:39 | but i never |
---|
0:01:41 | got to much cm other than you know like |
---|
0:01:43 | in the halls |
---|
0:01:44 | and tilt is filled fieldwork course that essentially everybody had to take |
---|
0:01:50 | and it was it was a great course because you come in the first day |
---|
0:01:55 | and how is there may be due to smoking at the time |
---|
0:01:59 | you hold the cigarette as mouth and |
---|
0:02:01 | squint against the smoke and there were twenty some odd students and he said |
---|
0:02:07 | that we had |
---|
0:02:08 | to by the next meeting get out into the have been in the field and |
---|
0:02:13 | bring back a few minutes |
---|
0:02:16 | none was seven with you |
---|
0:02:18 | slightest i have the slightest idea what that meant |
---|
0:02:21 | but it seems like |
---|
0:02:22 | get kicked into the pool |
---|
0:02:26 | that is |
---|
0:02:29 | well some sometimes fire sometimes i swear it is i think it was very scary |
---|
0:02:35 | for all of us and i think that's what's that the really the first important |
---|
0:02:39 | lesson you learned doing fieldwork is that it incredibly scary |
---|
0:02:45 | and it requires a lot of courage |
---|
0:02:49 | one for all of us to involved kerching a less for me because i decided |
---|
0:02:53 | i was involved in the club folk musician world so i decided that that's what |
---|
0:02:59 | i've got |
---|
0:03:01 | other people and certainly much students |
---|
0:03:05 | and my fieldwork course or are really scared by the experience |
---|
0:03:11 | it seems to me |
---|
0:03:14 | for you please use a you know writers was somewhat but also location paper we |
---|
0:03:22 | had a great intellectual |
---|
0:03:25 | into a more pure approach |
---|
0:03:31 | so |
---|
0:03:34 | what we compare this specifically way you approach |
---|
0:03:40 | however was very non directive |
---|
0:03:44 | what we didn't read anything in the field were course he didn't say okay these |
---|
0:03:48 | you're the text so this is stuff if the user articles you have to read |
---|
0:03:52 | we just given up higher like a bibliographic pile |
---|
0:03:57 | and if |
---|
0:03:58 | few for some of that looked interesting to read it |
---|
0:04:01 | or if it words you found to be useful |
---|
0:04:04 | but most of what the course involved was |
---|
0:04:08 | how we setting |
---|
0:04:10 | what's been going on this week |
---|
0:04:12 | and he would listen very carefully to this story sweet l is basically a narrative |
---|
0:04:16 | process and he would |
---|
0:04:19 | make points on the out of the stories |
---|
0:04:23 | and so the learning was very kind of back and forth and we were as |
---|
0:04:26 | responsible for the process of learning is as he wants |
---|
0:04:31 | so was very |
---|
0:04:33 | in the same way he views |
---|
0:04:36 | a field work as an inter tree iterative process |
---|
0:04:40 | he view the course itself as an iterative |
---|
0:04:45 | i guess there's always you can be approached by your re one would be |
---|
0:04:51 | the one proposed in particular |
---|
0:04:55 | another would be |
---|
0:04:57 | we use you can call type of self interest |
---|
0:05:02 | motivation past |
---|
0:05:04 | i feel for what we want to assume responsibility everything anything that might not directly |
---|
0:05:12 | right he was very much against a going into the field with preconceived notions |
---|
0:05:19 | having what he talked about is having an agenda |
---|
0:05:22 | he wasn't it he wasn't really for a genders |
---|
0:05:26 | i you can't going to any feel |
---|
0:05:29 | without some kind of basic idea of what's going on there |
---|
0:05:34 | but a lot of those if you're good field work are those basic ideas |
---|
0:05:39 | go away pretty so you're new find |
---|
0:05:42 | that that's not important but this other stuff that you had no idea about it's |
---|
0:05:46 | really important |
---|
0:05:47 | so how it talks about |
---|
0:05:49 | what he called sentimentality and how you had to avoid sentimentality |
---|
0:05:54 | which was essentially these preconceived notions of and political preconceived notions |
---|
0:06:01 | better actors blinders so you don't see what's really important |
---|
0:06:06 | and i one because there are very interesting for applications especially six |
---|
0:06:13 | but first i wanna ask questions from |
---|
0:06:18 | you comment on how we use my response stress clash |
---|
0:06:23 | in this was a very interesting question answer how to the style we use six |
---|
0:06:28 | for you have to use more how we how good i |
---|
0:06:40 | i think being as smart as how it is |
---|
0:06:45 | is a real advantage in doing that i think you one can pull it off |
---|
0:06:51 | and i kind of half arsed way |
---|
0:06:56 | by in the same way |
---|
0:06:58 | and non directive psychiatrist pulls it off |
---|
0:07:01 | or what do you think about that the send a private but how it was |
---|
0:07:06 | much better than that he would |
---|
0:07:08 | he would just toss out very small ideas but |
---|
0:07:13 | what is that remind you well |
---|
0:07:15 | i think were |
---|
0:07:18 | what what's that like |
---|
0:07:20 | this is something itself what is that like what you think that some like |
---|
0:07:24 | did you get the feeling when he is |
---|
0:07:29 | highly present with your answer |
---|
0:07:32 | two |
---|
0:07:34 | yes absolutely them he was very |
---|
0:07:38 | very much |
---|
0:07:39 | and that's a good field where it was very much focused on what was the |
---|
0:07:43 | exchange was what's going on |
---|
0:07:47 | and he was |
---|
0:07:48 | indeed it is interesting "'cause" |
---|
0:07:50 | he was not only it's |
---|
0:07:54 | a good interviewer and this is something was really good about how a good interview |
---|
0:07:58 | where is listening to you rather than thinking about the next thing he's going to |
---|
0:08:03 | say and that's exactly the way how we work |
---|
0:08:06 | okay |
---|
0:08:08 | exactly |
---|
0:08:09 | another question or rubber in this paper we describe how rather than the correlation between |
---|
0:08:16 | your account |
---|
0:08:19 | at the same time how is clearly needed for contributions |
---|
0:08:25 | can you say anymore have brought to see sociology next round people |
---|
0:08:32 | clearly doesn't make connections between what to the next |
---|
0:08:36 | you can see criticises where |
---|
0:08:41 | howie and i think you explicitly talks about the cs theory is kind of in |
---|
0:08:47 | inconvenient necessity |
---|
0:08:51 | then we never |
---|
0:08:53 | we never really in a certain in this class talked about |
---|
0:08:57 | theory explicitly at least early on |
---|
0:09:01 | what we talked about is what people and how it how it says that a |
---|
0:09:05 | very often |
---|
0:09:07 | blinds us or |
---|
0:09:11 | the flights us from seeing what's really going on that's what's important is that |
---|
0:09:18 | people are doing things together and how they understand what they're doing in the meaning |
---|
0:09:23 | structure that under words that |
---|
0:09:25 | and |
---|
0:09:27 | if you |
---|
0:09:29 | go into the field thinking that you're looking for |
---|
0:09:34 | institutional power structures and things like that |
---|
0:09:38 | where the kinds of things you more about the ins as a sociologist you're going |
---|
0:09:43 | be very disappointed "'cause" you won't see what you will see |
---|
0:09:46 | are people doing things together so that's what you focus on one and it is |
---|
0:09:50 | out of that |
---|
0:09:53 | that should begin to see certain patterns |
---|
0:09:56 | and it's out of those patterns that you begin to make sense of what's going |
---|
0:10:00 | on and that's out of that sense making process |
---|
0:10:04 | you begin to develop a which crudely we can call theory |
---|
0:10:09 | in this is the main story transition some time transition still happens in this one |
---|
0:10:17 | because i think |
---|
0:10:21 | that might indicate that his mel |
---|
0:10:26 | but you know how it is |
---|
0:10:28 | more work on the right |
---|
0:10:33 | you know coined the term or more |
---|
0:10:37 | right so this is related to cultural sociologist at least organisation |
---|
0:10:44 | i use that channel where variation |
---|
0:10:48 | to describe ways the actors |
---|
0:10:51 | tend to shape |
---|
0:10:53 | in used in three years it's to define the relationship between structure |
---|
0:11:03 | but the slow to fast but also show how he's making really theoretical genius |
---|
0:11:14 | how he was always |
---|
0:11:16 | one two |
---|
0:11:18 | value poking convention malady in the i |
---|
0:11:22 | so i'm i think |
---|
0:11:25 | that is a hunch that he's |
---|
0:11:29 | what sometimes might be seen as an entire theory |
---|
0:11:33 | position |
---|
0:11:34 | it's kind of poking conventional sociology i |
---|
0:11:38 | but |
---|
0:11:39 | what's really important just theory rather than understanding what's going on and some kind of |
---|
0:11:43 | real well |
---|
0:11:45 | but it certainly |
---|
0:11:47 | he has major responsible for developing broad range or something |
---|
0:11:53 | the what's crudely called labelling theory is basically |
---|
0:11:58 | you know he didn't |
---|
0:11:59 | think it up originally but he developed at important |
---|
0:12:06 | the collective action the whole way in which collective action works in |
---|
0:12:11 | the art world so various other kinds of productive world is really central to work |
---|
0:12:18 | a whole lot of people are doing |
---|
0:12:20 | the concept of more entrepreneurs is |
---|
0:12:23 | as you know spread too wide variety of disciplines |
---|
0:12:27 | so i again how it was not and tie theory he was just |
---|
0:12:33 | and tie being |
---|
0:12:36 | taken up solely with three |
---|
0:12:40 | so |
---|
0:12:42 | with regard how this approach to more complex plane |
---|
0:12:47 | one for |
---|
0:12:50 | this notion of what you say you bring to be too close |
---|
0:12:56 | he just behind one of sentimental you explicitly then the next close to three interested |
---|
0:13:05 | what you three your work house and she |
---|
0:13:16 | i really finds himself wonders is a form |
---|
0:13:24 | for some time |
---|
0:13:30 | otherwise not able to see that stage |
---|
0:13:36 | i think what how it was doing in talking about sentimentality and its dangers have |
---|
0:13:45 | a lot to do with political tender the time and all the whole bunch of |
---|
0:13:49 | us we're going in there you know right on brother and smash the state |
---|
0:13:57 | and |
---|
0:13:58 | the shape |
---|
0:14:00 | for that was interesting |
---|
0:14:03 | but |
---|
0:14:04 | one at all of us to avoid those |
---|
0:14:08 | preconceptions and see that stuff is what's important |
---|
0:14:11 | and so in that sense if the freedom derives from not be found by preconceptions |
---|
0:14:19 | not being bound by convention l t not being down by |
---|
0:14:25 | everyone knows is the case of one party was always attacking |
---|
0:14:29 | but how is how it has always intact is the i d is that |
---|
0:14:36 | what everyone knows |
---|
0:14:39 | actually should have some weight |
---|
0:14:43 | because what we use sociologist should do is look behind what everybody that |
---|
0:14:48 | and you see that actually what everybody knows is |
---|
0:14:53 | useful for song |
---|
0:14:55 | oppressive to others and |
---|
0:14:59 | but something that shouldn't should less be excepted |
---|
0:15:02 | then something that is question |
---|
0:15:05 | that's to include position is not necessary at all |
---|
0:15:11 | exactly |
---|
0:15:13 | and the political position |
---|
0:15:16 | however it importantly made the distinction between |
---|
0:15:20 | upon political position that one pass a person the as a person task |
---|
0:15:27 | and the political position that one moves into their sociology |
---|
0:15:34 | he was very much against the latter in very much for the former |
---|
0:15:39 | you know is a look |
---|
0:15:41 | what we should we don't if we think |
---|
0:15:45 | races in this a bad thing |
---|
0:15:47 | why in the world do we need sociology to prove that |
---|
0:15:52 | we know what then i know i can fight against it as an individual citizen |
---|
0:15:57 | in this society |
---|
0:15:59 | but we don't the science to prove |
---|
0:16:02 | oppression we don't need science to prove races and we don't need science to prove |
---|
0:16:07 | the impression of you know gender |
---|
0:16:09 | oppression |
---|
0:16:11 | it we it's something that we as citizens can fight against |
---|
0:16:17 | the that it's all that which side of you are you one notion that he |
---|
0:16:20 | talks |
---|
0:16:22 | final question from more |
---|
0:16:25 | which was taken from how scepticism useful all actions label for i |
---|
0:16:34 | just people to sociology particular just try |
---|
0:16:40 | you might not be tall |
---|
0:16:43 | to use it would be talking face interactions to right |
---|
0:16:50 | we would never talk |
---|
0:16:52 | about symbolic interaction isn't per se |
---|
0:16:56 | and the like and |
---|
0:16:57 | to talk about it but the theory courses and stuff but how we didn't talk |
---|
0:17:01 | about symbolic interaction is a man and a lot of |
---|
0:17:05 | his interview some of the center frequencies talks fairly negatively about interactions |
---|
0:17:11 | and i think that's |
---|
0:17:13 | because |
---|
0:17:17 | we can see saul much of |
---|
0:17:20 | inter the interaction is literature as getting away from what he thought was important as |
---|
0:17:26 | getting into |
---|
0:17:27 | the minutia of arguments about this year that only small element the theory |
---|
0:17:34 | or |
---|
0:17:35 | you know what need really meant by this |
---|
0:17:38 | when he didn't have much patience for that stuff any i'd i don't think it |
---|
0:17:42 | does i don't to get much patience for the kind of |
---|
0:17:46 | things that came into interaction is sociology as |
---|
0:17:51 | you know the post modernist face of interaction of sociology at the rabbits |
---|
0:17:57 | that stuff as a |
---|
0:18:00 | i that a bit beyond the kinds of things he was interest |
---|
0:18:05 | and so is that one point he says well when i read symbolic interaction the |
---|
0:18:09 | journal there's just not a lot in there that really interest me |
---|
0:18:15 | and i think that's because it was getting away from |
---|
0:18:18 | the basic notion of |
---|
0:18:20 | interaction a sociology is actually what people do with each other day and a |
---|
0:18:28 | project i think is important lesson personal |
---|
0:18:33 | the only thing |
---|
0:18:37 | no |
---|
0:18:38 | i shall i a drill team journals can think |
---|
0:18:44 | it's good beer |
---|
0:18:59 | o |
---|