my name is that it also for under the paper and sounds were growing risk
importance agent called you site selection now trends and sign selection of the missing wrote
one h two kinds of trial landscape between two thousand two thousand twelve it would
just a dramatic increase in them on control facilities also known as sites
the quality studies be more the key driving force behind this
this is in a significant impact on the availability and selection what can control experience
how can control inexperienced for naive signs
given the perceived risks was selecting and that's very nice sites this study the recent
trends inside selection and how we stress we managed is expansion into the global draw
landscape using data collected from one hundred forty oncology trials with the number specific trends
focusing on the number sign activated per year
as expected that increased alongside locations stimulating right and the number of sites of rule
however we also saw a significant decrease in the contribution of noisy sides to new
study to than the region
in fact but it into the user period this and twenty percent of all sides
activated been classified as an i
well this data highlights is that there is indeed a strong selection bias what experience
signs of a nice size in the region the key reasons for the spice are
likely to be the low recall rates all the start time lines i forty risks
that are perceived to exist with these new science the current management strategy these additional
risks
appears to be reducing the number of no use only utilized to the absolute minimum
which is mostly delivery be was entirely relied on previous the usual i size
this raises the question of how also i one is yours expanding to increase the
model and we are talking same sign over never again
a critical point jump prosody only size maybe reach that will be necessary to reach
out to additional new sites and grow disciple
interestingly at that it shows that resulted experience slight bias
this is not carry consistent that is that we see that has to some fluctuations
so what is typically below the right part of what has it is reached a
lot in certain outreach activities side is necessary to create a traditional trials
clearly quality safety and performance i want to find his insight selection
well with the current level of risk aversion unbiased what using the same troll size
is not sustainable in a region experience level right present in asia
in this i touching community we made a mindset change away from the current cycle
of low risk or by some high risk
a possibility would be to expand this i will be consistent inclusion of a number
nine sites combined with correct training programs and of aside
such a strategy would allow for the proper balance between eyesight risk an overall cycle
graph
i mean assuming that all ages a region of the next few years it'll be
able to start piecing out actual terms at the concept of long term sustainability